United States v. James Anthony Michaels, III

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the personal automobile was used to conduct business and then holding the business accomplished with the car affected interstate commerce
• finding that the personal automobile was used to conduct business and then holding the business accomplished with the car affected interstate commerce
• stating that sufficient evidence existed to satisfy the jurisdictional element of S 844(i) when the vehicle damaged was an integral and necessary part of the business
• discussing expectation of privacy in “an outdoor communal trash container serving an apartment building”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).