Skip to main content
· 1/11/2006

United States v. James Anderson Buckingham

Citations

  • 433 F.3d 508
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 567
  • 2006 WL 47529

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a signed consent form was not sufficient evidence to affirm the district court’s finding of voluntariness
  • after giving verbal consent to search, refusal to sign consent form — in conjunction with other factors — raises a question as to whether consent to search was withdrawn

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keith, Batchelder, Oberdorfer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.