Skip to main content
· 5/10/2006

United States v. James Anderson

Citations

  • 446 F.3d 870
  • 70 Fed. R. Serv. 149
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 11581
  • 2006 WL 1236094

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The district court did not abuse its discretion in permitting Kyle to describe generalized gambling operations and terminology.”
  • “Rule 702 does not rank academic training over demonstrated practical experience.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Colloton, Heaney, Gruender

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.