United States v. Jaja Zambrowski Davis, Morris Ramsey, a.k.a. \Fade\(amended 5/12/2003)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Apprendi 5 does not prohibit a sentencing court from imposing 5 In Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000
• sentencing courts may im- pose “consecutive sentences on multiple counts of conviction as long as each is within the applicable statutory maximum”
• “A defendant’s due process rights may be violated when a sentence is enhanced after the defendant has served so much of his sentence that his expectations as to finality have crystallized and it would be fundamentally unfair to defeat them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).