United States v. Jairo Espinosa-Hernandez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ordering an evidentiary hearing based on new evidence of serious allegations of misconduct, including false statements, by the case agent in charge of the operation leading to the indictment
• allowing an evi- dentiary hearing where it was discovered that a government agent who testified was indicted for making false statements and distrib- uting cocaine because it involved “serious and disturbing breaches of the public trust”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).