United States v. Jairo Andres Castro and Oscar Ramiro Pozo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that reviewing courts \must limit [themselves] to inquiring whether the district judge's actions amounted to an abuse of discretion\ in assessing rule of completeness determinations
• noting that the rule of completeness only applies to omitted statements
• where evidence against defendant overwhelming, and prejudice arising from error relatively insignificant, error likely harmless
• \[C]ourts historically have required a party offering testimony as to an utterance to present fairly the `substance or effect' and context of the statement.\
• discussing origins of rule of completeness
• discussing origins of rule of completeness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).