United States v. Jacques Rene Henri Vermeulen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the district court fulfilled its Rule 11 obligations where it informed defendant of the terms of imprisonment he could receive on each of two counts despite not using the words “consecutive” or “consecutively”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).