Skip to main content
· 5/6/1980

United States v. Jacob S. Sobotka

Citations

  • 623 F.2d 764
  • 47 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 775
  • 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 17823

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • disclosure of grand jury material to Connecticut Grievance Committee permissible where disciplinary proceedings are carried out before Connecticut Superior Court
  • district court could have achieved desired result merely by ordering disclosure of grand jury witnesses names and implies this would have been acceptable, see p. 768
  • disclosure of grand jury material to Connecticut Grievance Committee permissible where disciplinary proceedings are carried out before Connecticut Superior Court
  • “We conclude that while the necessity here be less compelling in view of the termination of the grand jury, nonetheless some necessity need be shown by the party seeking disclosure.”
  • disclosure to bar grievance com­ mittee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mulligan, Spears, Sweet

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.