Skip to main content

United States v. Jackson

Citations

  • 26 M.J. 377
  • 1988 CMA LEXIS 2528
  • 1988 WL 82044

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that even if there is no independent duty to account, a servicemember who lies in an oral statement to a law enforcement agent conducting an investigation as part of his duties has violated Article 107
  • construing Art. 107 ... consistent with the construction of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 in United States v. Rodgers, 466 U.S. 475, 480, 104 S.Ct. 1942, 1946-47, 80 L.Ed.2d 492 (1984)
  • “even if not subject to an independent ‘duty to account,’ a service member who lies to a law enforcement agent conducting an investigation as part of his duties has violated Article 107”
  • nature of “officiality” regarding false official statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cox, Everett, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.