United States Court of Military Appeals· 8/5/1955
United States v. Jackson
Citations
- 6 C.M.A. 193
- 6 USCMA 193
- 19 C.M.R. 319
- 1955 CMA LEXIS 310
- 1955 WL 3446
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- to be an aider and abettor “requires concert of purpose . . .a conscious sharing of [the perpetrator’s] criminal intent.”
- aider and abettor theory “requires concert of purpose or the aiding or encouraging of the perpetrator of the offense and a conscious sharing of his criminal intent”
- mere inactive presence at scene of crime is not aiding and abetting
- mere inactive presence at scene of crime is not aiding and abetting
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brosman, Latimer, Quinn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. DicarioUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1957-11-01· cited 55×
- United States v. CrouchUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1981-06-08· cited 35×
- United States v. PritchettUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1990-09-26· cited 31×
- United States v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2006-04-24· cited 29×
- United States v. McCarthyUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1960-08-05· cited 24×
- United States v. BurroughsUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1982-03-01· cited 22×
- United States v. MorrisonUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1982-01-18· cited 21×
- United States v. BuchanaUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1970-04-24· cited 20×
- United States v. KachougianUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1956-06-15· cited 19×
- United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1963-03-29· cited 19×
- United States v. DesroeUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1956-02-24· cited 18×
- United States v. FriersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1971-04-02· cited 18×
- United States v. LyonsUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1959-12-18· cited 17×
- United States v. KnudsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1982-08-30· cited 16×
- United States v. JeffersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1986-08-25· cited 16×
- United States v. MiltonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1997-07-30· cited 15×
- United States v. SalisburyUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1963-08-02· cited 14×
- United States v. NakamuraU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review· 1985-10-31· cited 14×
- United States v. WaluskiUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1956-03-16· cited 11×
- United States v. FordUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1960-12-02· cited 10×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-10-14· cited 3,200×
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1954-02-01· cited 1,531×
- Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-05-31· cited 977×
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1951-04-23· cited 242×
- People v. ZammoraCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1944-10-04· cited 107×
- Combs v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1928-05-22· cited 28×
- United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1953-08-21· cited 23×
- United States v. WootenUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1952-05-02· cited 20×
- United States v. BlevensUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1955-02-18· cited 19×
- United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1954-03-26· cited 18×
- United States v. JacobsUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1952-03-13· cited 17×
- True v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1890-11-25· cited 13×
- Landrum v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1906-10-11· cited 13×
- Mills v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1919-07-16· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.