United States v. Jack Walder Wright A/K/A Robert Morgan, John C. Heredia, and Joseph Wayne Haws

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to reverse for abuse of discretion where appellant showed no prejudice
• affirming conviction for wire fraud based on \participation in [a] fraudulent scheme\
• \It would be puerile to suggest that if any part of a statement is [to] be admitted the entire statement must be admitted.\
• evidence of diary entries admissible where material and probative, no direct evidence existed on same subject, and the statements were trustworthy and not frivolous
• \It would be puerile to suggest that if any part of a statement is [to] be admitted the entire statement must be admitted.\
• conclusion on appeal that district court abused its discretion “does not require reversal if that abuse amounted to harmless error”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).