United States v. Jack Parker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a finding of materiality in a Brady claim requires a reasonable probability that the evidence would have produced a different result
• noting that Brady evidence is material if, with such evidence, there is reasonable probability that jury would have acquitted
• finding that the defendant’s knowledge that a witness was involved in a scam did not relieve the government of its obligations under Brady to disclose that the witness was subject of an ongoing fraud investigation by the SEC
• “[A] Brady violation had not occurred if the defense is aware, or should have been aware, of impeachment evidence in time to use it in a reasonable and effective manner at trial.”
• “[A] Brady violation has not occurred if the defense is aware, or should have been aware, of impeachment evidence in time to use it in a reasonable and effective manner at trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).