United States v. Jack Lee Higgins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court may dismiss a claim 3 grounded in fraud if the allegations do not satisfy Rule 9(b)
• where defendant conceded that a custodial encounter had not occurred, Miranda and its progeny did not apply and no constitutional violation occurred
• elements of a fraud claim under California law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).