· 12/7/1981
United States v. Jack Lee Colson, Delton C. Copeland
Citations
- 662 F.2d 1389
- 9 Fed. R. Serv. 728
- 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 15465
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming order denying bill of particulars where the defendant otherwise had knowledge of the identities of unindicted co-conspirators
- “[R]equiring production of a list of the gov- ernment’s witnesses is a matter of judicial discretion, and proof of abuse of discretion is necessary for reversal.”
- “The purpose of a bill of particulars is to inform the defendant of the charge in sufficient detail to enable adequate de- fense preparation and to minimize surprise at trial.”
- no bill of particulars necessary in such a circumstance
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hill, Vance, Hatchett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.