Ninth Circuit· 6/30/1992
United States v. Jack Lande
Citations
- 968 F.2d 907
- 20 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1753
- 92 Daily Journal DAR 9127
- 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 14725
- 1992 WL 145088
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “person who views satellite television programming by the use of a modified descrambler and satellite dish ‘intentionally intercepts’ the satellite television signal”
- modified descramblers are “primarily useful for the purpose of ... surreptitious interception” of satellite transmissions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Browning, Wright, Fernandez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- DIRECTV, Inc. v. RobsonFifth Circuit· 2005-08-09· cited 278×
- DIRECTV Inc. v. PepeThird Circuit· 2005-12-15· cited 185×
- United States v. Terry ChristensenNinth Circuit· 2016-07-08· cited 134×
- United States v. Duane Dale DavisEighth Circuit· 1992-10-28· cited 66×
- DirecTV, Inc. v. WebbNinth Circuit· 2008-09-25· cited 62×
- United States v. Stephen L. Shriver, Joseph R. Denman, Harry Lawrence Daly, and Joseph D. FonesSeventh Circuit· 1993-04-02· cited 50×
- DirecTV, Inc. v. HartE.D. North Carolina· 2004-09-28· cited 25×
- United States v. Kenneth Steven BaileyNinth Circuit· 1994-10-20· cited 24×
- United States v. Terry ChristensenNinth Circuit· 2015-08-25· cited 23×
- United States v. Mark Palmer SplawnTenth Circuit· 1992-12-15· cited 20×
- United States v. CrawfordFifth Circuit· 1995-05-15· cited 17×
- Don King Productions/Kingvision v. LovatoN.D. California· 1995-12-18· cited 17×
- United States v. Charles Leslie HarrellFifth Circuit· 1993-01-29· cited 13×
- United States v. Bennie Dean Herring, Billy Clyde Herring, Ronald Mills, and Dee Dee BellEleventh Circuit· 1993-06-21· cited 13×
- United States v. HarrellNinth Circuit· 2008-06-30· cited 13×
- Allarcom Pay Television, Ltd. v. General Instrument Corp.Ninth Circuit· 1995-11-02· cited 12×
- United States v. One MacOm Video Cipher Ii, Sn A6j050073, Anthony E. Goldberg, Claimant-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 1993-02-03· cited 11×
- United States v. NorrisN.D. Indiana· 1993-07-21· cited 10×
- In the Matter of the Application of the State of NewNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2017-02-02· cited 9×
- In Re Cases Filed by DIRECTV, Inc.D. Arizona· 2004-11-09· cited 8×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 4,657×
- United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court· 1979-06-04· cited 1,568×
- Ball v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1985-03-26· cited 1,092×
- Moskal v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-12-03· cited 742×
- United States v. Richard Van WinrowNinth Circuit· 1991-12-16· cited 71×
- United States v. McNuttTenth Circuit· 1990-07-03· cited 40×
- United States v. Bennie Dean Herring, Billy Clyde Herring, Ronald Mills, and Dee Dee BellEleventh Circuit· 1991-06-17· cited 32×
- United States v. Mae C. AndersonNinth Circuit· 1988-06-28· cited 28×
- United States v. Austin Jerry Hux, Dba Fireball ElectronicsEighth Circuit· 1991-07-26· cited 16×
- United States v. Mark Palmer SplawnTenth Circuit· 1992-04-27· cited 13×
- United States v. ShriverC.D. Illinois· 1992-02-04· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.