United States v. Jack L. Lewis, United States of America v. James L. Willoz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that fines collected under a statute that is subsequently determined to be unconstitutional must be repaid when suit is brought to recover them
• stating that fines collected under a statute that is subsequently determined 2 to be unconstitutional must be repaid when suit is brought to recover them
• repaying fine from vacated conviction is “an incident to the vacating and setting aside of the conviction”
• “Since the district court was empowered to set aside the conviction, it could also correct the unlawful result of the conviction and require the repayment of the money collected as fines.”
• “Since the district court was empowered to set aside the conviction, it could also correct the unlawful result of the conviction and require the repayment of the money collected as fines.”
• “Since the district court was empowered to set aside the [defendant’s] conviction, it could also correct the unlawful result of the conviction and require the repayment of the money collected as fines.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).