United States v. Jack King and Terry Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence outside the indictment “is irrelevant to a determination of whether the indictment itself is legally sufficient”
• holding that evidence outside the indictment \is irrelevant to a determination of whether the indictment itself is legally sufficient\
• because pretrial order dismissing information, which was based on extrinsic evidence, was issued before the trier of fact commenced to take evidence, \[s]ubsequent prosecution is not barred by double jeopardy clause\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).