Skip to main content
· 1/24/1997

United States v. Jack Conrad Choate

Citations

  • 101 F.3d 562

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming a broad ban on self-employment, while stating that \[t]he district court is not required to pit its imagination against [the defendant's] to anticipate what sort of business [the defendant] could put to fraudulent use\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Heaney, Gibson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.