United States v. Jack C. Turner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• admitting under Rule 801(d)(2)(E) conversations of co-conspirators about how proceeds of theft would be distributed
• admitting testimony of officer concerning taped conversations despite government’s failure to provide tapes to defense, due to the absence of bad faith
• upholding a jury charge on knowledge which stated: “the proof need not show who may have stolen the property involved, only that the Defendant knew it had been stolen or taken by fraud at the time it was transported”
• The recorded conversation found admissible under Rule 801(d)(2)(E) was between a coconspirator and an uninvolved intimate female acquaintance in which the coconspirator discussed relevant facts concerning his conspiracy with the defendant.
• conversations among co-conspirators about how proceeds of theft were going to be distributed were admissible under Rule 801(d)(2)(E)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).