United States v. Jacinto Rivera

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding defendant was not in cus- tody after he was given his written warning, “had all his iden- tification, he was told that the investigation was over, he was free to leave at his pleasure and, indeed, was leaving when the trooper popped the question of consensual search”
• Certain of the questions asked by a trooper of an individual during a traffic stop were casual banter or were justified by the trooper’s reasonable suspicion.
• an officer’s subjective intent is irrelevant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).