United States v. Jace Edwards

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[B]ecause Defendants offered these statements ‘to explain why’ they terminated Shearer, that is, ‘for the statements’ effect on the listener—those statements [were] not offered for their truth. Therefore, they [are] admissible for a non-hearsay purpose.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).