Skip to main content
· 9/1/1999

United States v. Jabril Shareef

Citations

  • 190 F.3d 71
  • 5 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1035
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 20884

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that prosecutorial misconduct is grounds for reversal “only if it causes the defendant substantial prejudice so infecting the trial with unfairness as to make the resulting conviction a denial of due process.”
  • “Remarks of the prosecutor in summation do not amount to a denial of due process unless they constitute ‘egregious misconduct.’” (internal quote omitted)
  • “Remarks of the prosecutor in summation do not amount to a denial of due process unless they constitute ‘egregious misconduct.’” (internal quote omitted)
  • “Remarks of the prosecutor in summation do not amount to a denial of due process unless they constitute ‘egregious misconduct.’” (citation omitted)
  • “[A]lthough . . . [counsel’s] summation [comments] were improper . . . these transgressions were isolated; the trial court upheld [defendant’s] objections[.]”
  • “[W]e consider . . . the measures adopted to cure [misconduct].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kearse, Straub, Pooler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.