Skip to main content
· 11/23/1992

United States v. J. Rogers Badgett, Sr., D/B/A Georgetown Apartments Jean Brittain

Citations

  • 976 F.2d 1176

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that HUD has adopted the McDonnell Douglas test for evaluating actions under the FHA
  • concluding in housing-discrimination case that trial court “failed to apply the McDonnell Douglas standard [applicable to circumstantial evidence claims], and therefore erred as a matter of law”
  • court will scrutinize any nongovernmental occupancy limit to determine whether it unreasonably limits or excludes persons with minor children
  • “If the result of [a facially neutral occupancy] policy is a disparate impact on a protected class, facial neutrality will not save the restriction from violating the Act”
  • “McDonnell Douglas test recognizes that direct proof of unlawful discrimination is rarely available”
  • strongly indicating that disparate impact actions under the FHA are permissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gibson, Beam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.