· 11/23/1992
United States v. J. Rogers Badgett, Sr., D/B/A Georgetown Apartments Jean Brittain
Citations
- 976 F.2d 1176
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that HUD has adopted the McDonnell Douglas test for evaluating actions under the FHA
- concluding in housing-discrimination case that trial court “failed to apply the McDonnell Douglas standard [applicable to circumstantial evidence claims], and therefore erred as a matter of law”
- court will scrutinize any nongovernmental occupancy limit to determine whether it unreasonably limits or excludes persons with minor children
- “If the result of [a facially neutral occupancy] policy is a disparate impact on a protected class, facial neutrality will not save the restriction from violating the Act”
- “McDonnell Douglas test recognizes that direct proof of unlawful discrimination is rarely available”
- strongly indicating that disparate impact actions under the FHA are permissible
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gibson, Beam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.