Skip to main content
· 12/22/2005

United States v. Ivanchukov

Citations

  • 405 F. Supp. 2d 708
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35859
  • 2005 WL 3526493

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • adopting a “but for” nexus test for illegal proceeds under the criminal forfeiture statute and noting the test’s use in several other circuits
  • reinforcing the “but for” test for forfeiture

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ellis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.