· 12/22/2005
United States v. Ivanchukov
Citations
- 405 F. Supp. 2d 708
- 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35859
- 2005 WL 3526493
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- adopting a “but for” nexus test for illegal proceeds under the criminal forfeiture statute and noting the test’s use in several other circuits
- reinforcing the “but for” test for forfeiture
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ellis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.