United States v. Ivan W. Brown and Gordon M. Kenngott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant argued that the district court's definition of knowingly negated the specific intent to defraud, but the court held that including the intent to defraud in the elements of the substantive offense was sufficient
• defendant argued that the district court’s definition of knowingly negated the specific intent to defraud, but the court held that including the intent to defraud in the elements of the substantive offense was sufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).