United States v. Ivan T. Joseph

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) “does not prevent all prisoners 14 || from accessing the courts; it only precludes prisoners with a history of abusing the legal 15 ||system from continuing to abuse it while enjoying IFP status’
• explaining that “[tjhis rule applies to § '924(c)(1) indictments drafted in the conjunctive, which can support a conviction if the jury is charged and the violation is proved dis-junctively” (citing United States v. Dickey, 102 F.3d 157, 164 n.8 (5th Cir. 1996)
• contrary to plaintiff’s claims of lack of improvement, physician 15 reported symptoms improved with use of medication
• an ALJ may reject a doctor’s opinion when it is 14 inconsistent with other evidence in the record
• “Where the evidence is susceptible to more than one rational 15 interpretation, it is the ALJ’s conclusion that must be upheld.”
• “A physician's opinion of disability premised to a large 16 extent upon the claimant's own accounts of his symptoms and limitations may be 17 disregarded where those complaints have been properly discounted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).