United States v. Islip

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “As long as Defendant purposefully directed his actions toward the forum state, it does not matter where those actions were taken.”
• Customs fraud defendant given seven rather than the required 30 days to respond was not deprived of due process such as would preclude jurisdiction on review because “[dlefendant was ultimately given sufficient opportunity to be heard at the administrative level.”
• interpreting Article 10(b) and (c)’s “competent person” provision broadly

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).