United States v. Isaac Ray Senior

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that proximity in time is an appropriate factor to consider when deviating from the guidelines range
• affirming departure where district court noted that three priors were “more or less one criminal episode” and concurrent sentences were imposed for the three
• affirming sentence based on the guideline range that would have applied absent the career offender status

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).