United States v. Ironi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a declarant’s own contradictory statements “undermined” the trustworthiness of an alleged admission against interest
• noting that prejudicial effect of prior-crimes evidence was reduced when the district court instructed jury to consider prior-crimes evidence only to determine intent
• noting that the “prejudicial effect of admitting the prior crimes was reduced by the district court’s limiting instruction to the jury that it could only consider the prior crimes to determine [the defendant’s] intent”
• allowing evidence of possession of cocaine occurring eight and ten years before the aiding and abetting possession with intent to distribute cocaine charge at issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).