Skip to main content
· 3/6/2007

United States v. Ira Kukafka

Citations

  • 478 F.3d 531
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 5199
  • 2007 WL 676663

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A] court should consider: (1) ‘the economic nature of the regulated activity;’ (2) ‘a jurisdictional element limiting the reach of the law to a discrete set of activities that additionally has an explicit connection with or effect on interstate commerce;’ (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fuentes, Van Antwerpen Padova

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.