United States v. Iona M. Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that _____ Evidence Rule 103 requires that objections be made at the time evidence is offered
• noting that review of admission of evidence under the business records exception is for abuse of discretion
• holding head of bank’s consumer loan department qualified to introduce computer generated “loan histories” as business records where complied by service bureau connected by telephone lines to bank, and she and others at bank could and did retrieve information
• holding that computer-generated “loan histories” constituted hearsay
• recognizing the district court's broad discretion to prohibit cross- examination that would introduce into the case collateral matters - 14 - that could confuse the jury, even if such examination is relevant to a witness's credibility or perception
• affirming limit on cross- examination of witness who saw a therapist after the death of her child, and ten years prior to the embezzlement conspiracy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).