United States v. Ioannis Tzakis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court did not abuse its discretion by imposing on defendant, as condition of probation, joint and several liability with co-defendant for restitution of full amount of losses caused by their crime
• holding that district court did not abuse its discretion by imposing on defendant, as condition of probation, joint and several liability with codefendant for restitution of full amount of losses caused by their crime
• holding that district court did not abuse its discretion by imposing on defendant, as condition of probation, joint and several liability with co-defendant for restitution of full amount of losses caused by their crime
• denying motion to reopen for defendant’s failure to adduce “any significant, new factual matters that would have been developed at such a hearing”
• concluding 6 that the district court acted “well within its discretion in refusing to reopen” a suppression 7 hearing when the movant failed to “point to any significant, new factual matters that would 8 have been developed at” a reopened hearing
• defendant cannot assert post-hoc limits on a listener’s recording o f conversation by alleging that his willingness to allow overhearing did not encompass perm ission to record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).