Supreme Court· 4/16/1973
United States v. Indrelunas
Citations
- 411 U.S. 216
- 93 S. Ct. 1562
- 36 L. Ed. 2d 202
- 1973 U.S. LEXIS 84
- 17 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1
- 31 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1093
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the separate document requirement of Rule 58 must be “mechanically applied”
- holding that separate document requirement of Rule 58 is mandatory
- holding that separate document requirement of Rule 58 is mandatory
- emphasizing that the purpose of the separate-document requirement was “to remove uncertainties as to when a judgment is entered”
- explaining that entry of final judgment “has a most important bearing . . . on the time for appeal and the making of post-judgment motions that go to the finality of the judgment for purposes of appeal” (quotation omitted)
- addressing whether a stipulation specifying the amount of refund to be paid to each of the prevailing parties was a judgment that triggered the time to appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
258 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court· 2001-02-01· cited 4,923×
- Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court· 1993-06-24· cited 4,378×
- Bankers Trust Co. v. MallisSupreme Court· 1978-05-15· cited 904×
- LeBoon v. Lancaster Jewish Community Center Ass'nThird Circuit· 2007-09-19· cited 624×
- Terry Wayne Sanders v. Clemco Industries and Ingersoll-Rand CompanyEighth Circuit· 1988-11-30· cited 330×
- Girardeau A. Spann v. Colonial Village, Inc. Girardeau A. Spann v. Marvin J. GerstinD.C. Circuit· 1990-03-13· cited 264×
- Allan G. Charles v. Richard M. Daley, State's Attorney, and Eugene F. Diamond, InterveningSeventh Circuit· 1986-12-01· cited 233×
- Arlene Otis v. City of ChicagoSeventh Circuit· 1994-07-18· cited 180×
- United States v. Metropolitan District Commission, Conservation Law Foundation of New England, Inc.First Circuit· 1988-05-19· cited 160×
- Robert Eckstein v. Balcor Film InvestorsSeventh Circuit· 1993-08-20· cited 160×
- In Re Erwin A. Porges, Also Known as E. Allen Porges, Debtor. Erwin A. Porges, Also Known as E. Allen Porges v. Gruntal & Company, IncorporatedSecond Circuit· 1995-01-05· cited 157×
- James Freeman v. Pittsburgh Glass Works LLCThird Circuit· 2013-03-06· cited 145×
- Exchange National Bank of Chicago v. Harold Daniels and Irene DanielsSeventh Circuit· 1985-07-12· cited 135×
- Al-Hakim Allah v. Superior Court of the State of California, Los Angeles County, R.A. Doeve, Real-Parties-In-InterestNinth Circuit· 1989-04-03· cited 133×
- In Re Smith Corset Shops, Inc., Debtor. Appeal of Laurent BrodeurFirst Circuit· 1982-12-27· cited 130×
- Steven A. Kurowski and David H. Nicholls v. James J. Krajewski, Individually and in His Capacity as Judge of the Lake County Court, Division IIISeventh Circuit· 1988-06-02· cited 128×
- Francis A. Willhauck, Jr. v. Paul HalpinFirst Circuit· 1992-01-29· cited 126×
- Robert L. Glidden v. Chromalloy American Corporation and Allied Products CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1986-12-23· cited 114×
- Sebastian Scola v. Boat Frances, R., Inc.First Circuit· 1980-03-25· cited 108×
- R.F. Vernon v. Margaret Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesNinth Circuit· 1987-05-04· cited 108×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co.Supreme Court· 1958-04-07· cited 219×
- United States v. D. W. Evans and Edith EvansTenth Circuit· 1966-09-19· cited 24×
- Pure Oil Co. v. BoyneFifth Circuit· 1966-12-06· cited 21×
- Patricia Ann Levin v. Wear-Ever Aluminum, Inc. And Edmond Kennedy, JrThird Circuit· 1970-06-01· cited 18×
- Superior Life Insurance Company v. United States of America, Superior Life Insurance Company v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1972-06-07· cited 18×
- Harry H. Foiles v. United States of America, and Third-Party v. Alphonse T. Indrelunas, Third-PartyThird Circuit· 1972-08-22· cited 2×
Other cases named United States v. Indrelunas
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.