United States v. Igor Antonio Sandoval

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding where tape corroborated by independent testimony of two police officers, and where defendant did not challenge accuracy of recording, court did not err in admitting tape despite prosecution’s failure to authenticate it
• standard is that possibilities of misidentification and adulteration be eliminated, not absolutely, but as a matter of reasonable probability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).