Skip to main content
· 6/4/2013

United States v. Ian Watson

Citations

  • 405 U.S. App. D.C. 137
  • 717 F.3d 196
  • 2013 WL 2395072
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 11132

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[V]enue is proper in any jurisdiction where any co-conspirator committed an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy.\
  • “[V]enue is proper in any jurisdiction where any co-conspirator committed an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy.”
  • “[C]ounsel does not perform defi- ciently by declining to pursue a losing argument.”
  • “[C]ounsel does not perform deficiently by declining to pursue a losing argument.”
  • “[C]ounsel does not perform deficiently by declining to pursue a losing argument.”
  • no deficient performance where counsel declines to pursue a “losing argument”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henderson, Tatel, Kavanaugh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.