United States v. Ian Aza Jerome Owens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that this court routinely remands when a district judge fails to conduct a Remmer hearing in spite of a colorable claim of extraneous influence
• applying harmless error review to restitution issue that involved the MVRA
• refusing to remand where, after a complaining juror had “expressed fear,” “[u]pon the agree- ment of both parties, the court instructed the courtroom dep- uty to advise the jury that . . . [the defendant] does not pose a security risk to anyone”
• denying postconviction relief from a federal conviction for bank robbery where the petitioner argued that Owens was entitled to a Remmer hearing because one of the jurors passed a note to the judge expressing the juror’s discomfort with Owens for “staring at her”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).