United States v. Huslage

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was reasonable to renew search of automobile the morning after the search was begun because “inadequate lighting prevented the police from thoroughly searching the vehicle at 4:10 A.M.”
• holding that it was reasonable to renew search of automobile the morning after the search was begun because \[i]nadequate lighting prevented the police from thoroughly searching the vehicle at 4:10 A.M.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Gregory O. Daniels
  D.C. Circuit· 1985-09-25· cited 138×
• United States v. Steven L. Kaplan, M.D.
  Ninth Circuit· 1990-02-07· cited 101×
• United States v. Rudolph Keszthelyi
  Sixth Circuit· 2002-10-17· cited 96×
• United States v. Henry Carter, A/K/A A.B. Lay A/K/A Prince, Tracy Lynn Jones, and Sheila Marie O'Meara
  Eighth Circuit· 1988-09-22· cited 74×
• United States v. Jeffrey Todd Gerber
  Eleventh Circuit· 1993-07-12· cited 57×
• San Pedro v. United States
  Eleventh Circuit· 1996-04-09· cited 35×
• Graham v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1980-11-14· cited 16×
• State v. Finesmith
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2009-04-21· cited 15×
• Braund v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2000-11-09· cited 7×
• United States v. Graham
  D. Connecticut· 2000-10-26· cited 4×
• United States v. Poole
  United States Court of Military Appeals· 1990-08-10· cited 4×
• De La Torre v. City of Renton
  W.D. Washington· 2016-02-22· cited 1×
• State v. Gomez
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-08-19· cited 1×
• United States v. Pape
  D. Minnesota· 2013-01-07

Other cases named United States v. Huslage

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• United States v. Huslage
  Third Circuit· 1980-05-28