United States v. Hunnell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• [D]efendant's insistance [sic] upon this court's reading back into the claims limitations which were originally there and were removed during prosecution of the application through the Patent Office cannot be permitted.
• [Defendant's insistance [sic] upon this court’s reading back into the claims limitations which were originally there and were removed during prosecution of the application through the Patent Office cannot be permitted.
• “Anyone with even the most rudimentary understanding of the English language understands ‘at least one piezo-electric crystal’ . . . to mean one or more crystals.”
• “Anyone with even the most rudimentary understanding of the English language understands ‘at least one . . .’ to mean ‘one or more . . . .’”
• “[Defendant’s insistence upon this court's reading back into the claims limitations which were originally there and were removed during prosecution of the application through the Patent Office cannot be permitted.”
• aff'g and adopting 203 USPQ 511, 516

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).