United States v. Humberto Duron-Caldera

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that Confrontation Clause challenges are subject to a harmless error analysis
• declining to adopt inherently inculpatory rationale because it was rejected by five justices as well as Melendez-Diaz
• “Significantly, the government bears the burden of defeating a properly raised Confrontation Clause objection by establishing that its evidence is non-testimonial” (quotation omitted)
• “[D]ocuments prepared by immigration officers on immigration forms can be testimonial if created for use at a later criminal trial.”
• “Significantly, the government bears the burden of defeating a properly raised Confrontation Clause objection by establishing that its evidence is nontestimonial.” (quotation omitted)
• “Significantly, the government bears the burden of defeating a properly raised Confrontation Clause objection by establishing that its evidence is nontestimonial.” (internal quotations and alteration omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).