United States v. Hult

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the possibility that plaintiff could have salvaged enough of the cut timber to offset the stumpage value of the cut timber could be considered as potential mitigation only after plaintiff’s damages had been doubled

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named United States v. Hult

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• United States v. Hult
  Ninth Circuit· 1963-06-18