United States v. Huitron-Guizar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the right to bear arms “is qualified by what one might call the ‘who,’ ‘what,’ ‘where,’ ‘when,’ and ‘why’”
• declining to address a “large and complicated” Second Amendment issue whose resolution involved a “textual-historical inquiry [that was] unaddressed in the parties’ briefs, []or . . . in the record”
• refusing to determine whether unlawful aliens are within the scope of the Second Amendment and instead assuming it for the second part of the analysis
• declining to reach the issue because § 922(g)(5) passes intermediate scrutiny in any case
• concluding “§ 922(g)(5) withstands [the defendant’s] Second Amendment” challenge
• refusing to determine whether unlawful aliens are within the scope of the Second Amendment and instead assuming it for the second part of 42 UNITED STATES V. SINGH the analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).