United States v. Huey Whitley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting Franks inquiry properly includes the evaluation of the state of mind of government actors from whom affiant receives information
• applying the subjective standard for recklessness to omissions from an affidavit
• to prove reckless disregard for truth, defendant must establish that affiant “in fact entertained serious doubts as to the truth of his allegations”
• “The Fourth Amendment requires the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing upon a defendant’s preliminary showing that: (1) the warrant affidavit contained false information; (2
• “[T]he standard require[s] more than mere negligence on the part of the affiant.”
• recounting the extensive testimony bearing on defendant’s Franks motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).