United States v. Hubenka

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deferring to the Army Corps of Engineers’ interpretation of part of the Clean Water Act
• analyzing an interpretation of the Clean Water Act to determine whether the Corps’ interpretation of Act was permissible
• \[T]he potential for pollutants to migrate from a tributary to navigable waters downstream constitutes a 'significant nexus' between those waters.\
• “When a case involves an agency’s interpretation of a statute it administers, this court uses the two-step approach announced in Chevron . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).