Skip to main content
· 6/19/1998

United States v. Howard Paul Guthrie

Citations

  • 144 F.3d 1006
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 13013
  • 1998 WL 320328

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the determination of the amount of loss is a finding of fact
  • determining no notice required when the district court applied an enhancement for offenses involving fraud or deceit, even though the probation department did not recommend the enhancement in the presentence report
  • denial warranted when defendant who had already pleaded guilty blamed actions on bad advice of counsel and did not assist in recovering fruits of his offense
  • “[T]he Sentencing Guidelines’ fraud provision is a very broad guideline encompassing a wide variety of offenses; because bankruptcy fraud involves a higher level of culpability due to its deception of the court, the offense warrants a greater punishment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Batchelder, Cole, McCALLA

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.