Skip to main content
· 5/26/1995

United States v. Howard Kenneth Smith

Citations

  • 55 F.3d 157
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 12921
  • 1995 WL 320398

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that although trial court's discretion when considering motion to dismiss is limited, it may deny it where bad faith or disservice to the public interest is found
  • stating “[t]he disservice to the public interest must be found, if at all, in the motive of the prosecutor”
  • providing examples of bad faith, such as acceptance of a bribe, personal dislike of the victim or accuser, or dissatisfaction with the empaneled jury
  • “[T]he duty of the United States Attorney [is] not simply to prosecute but to do justice.”
  • “A motion that is not motivated by bad faith is not clearly contrary to manifest public interest, and it must be granted.”
  • “The trial court has little discretion in considering a government motion to dismiss made pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48(a).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall, Motz, Butzner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.