· 9/24/1980
United States v. Howard Hill
Citations
- 626 F.2d 429
- 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 13723
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- suggesting that reasonable suspicion does not exist where the “only facts used to justify a seizure involved characteristics matching the ‘drug courier profile’ ”
- interrogation could no longer be characterized as “brief” when police requested that suspect aceompany him to private office; probable cause or consent thus required
- questioning continuing validity of Elmore
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tuttle, Goldberg, Randall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.