Skip to main content
· 9/24/1980

United States v. Howard Hill

Citations

  • 626 F.2d 429
  • 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 13723

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting that reasonable suspicion does not exist where the “only facts used to justify a seizure involved characteristics matching the ‘drug courier profile’ ”
  • interrogation could no longer be characterized as “brief” when police requested that suspect aceompany him to private office; probable cause or consent thus required
  • questioning continuing validity of Elmore

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tuttle, Goldberg, Randall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.