Ninth Circuit· 8/4/1997
United States v. Howard Handa
Citations
- 122 F.3d 690
- 1997 WL 537587
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Section 2255 confers on district courts “broad and flexible power” to craft an 4 || appropriate remedy
- Section 2255 confers on district courts “broad and flexible power” to craft an 6 appropriate remedy
- \A district court does not have inherent power to resentence defendants at any time. Its authority to do so must flow either from the court of appeals mandate under 28 U.S.C.S 2106 (1982) or from Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Noonan, O'Scannlain, Rhoades
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Michael Ray HicksTenth Circuit· 1998-06-09· cited 138×
- United States v. WrightNinth Circuit· 2010-11-04· cited 111×
- United States v. Hector Ramon Diaz-ClarkEleventh Circuit· 2002-06-05· cited 95×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Scott BARRON, Jr., Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1999-04-16· cited 91×
- United States v. Silvio SpalloneSecond Circuit· 2005-03-04· cited 62×
- United States v. Miriam AguirreNinth Circuit· 2000-06-19· cited 55×
- United States v. Luis Angel Torres-Otero, A/K/A El Enamo, A/K/A Little Luis, A/K/A Primo, Luis A. Torres-Otero v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 2000-11-14· cited 50×
- United States v. Barragan-MendozaNinth Circuit· 1999-04-19· cited 49×
- United States v. MaldonadoFirst Circuit· 2001-02-23· cited 48×
- United States v. Manuel Ruiz-AlvarezNinth Circuit· 2000-05-22· cited 47×
- United States v. Oscar CeballosNinth Circuit· 2011-11-07· cited 43×
- United States v. Todd HorobNinth Circuit· 2013-11-07· cited 40×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas Lavell McCLAIN, Defendant-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1998-02-26· cited 39×
- United States v. WatkinsEleventh Circuit· 1998-07-28· cited 34×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jess A. RODRIGUES, Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1998-10-28· cited 34×
- United States v. Fidel Castro-VerdugoNinth Circuit· 2014-05-06· cited 34×
- Ferrara v. United StatesD. Massachusetts· 2005-04-12· cited 29×
- United States v. Steven Jay RadmallNinth Circuit· 2003-08-15· cited 28×
- United States v. BookerDistrict of Columbia· 2017-03-02· cited 24×
- James Troiano v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 2019-03-22· cited 22×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1995-12-06· cited 3,526×
- United States v. Barry Davis, A/K/A \Mark Johnson\Third Circuit· 1997-04-23· cited 170×
- United States v. Charles H. Harrison, Jr., Also Known as ChuckEighth Circuit· 1997-07-02· cited 148×
- United States v. Mister T. HillaryFourth Circuit· 1997-02-14· cited 116×
- United States v. Richard Alexander SmithSeventh Circuit· 1997-01-21· cited 104×
- United States v. David L. FowlerNinth Circuit· 1986-07-22· cited 84×
- United States v. Shawn L. BinfordSeventh Circuit· 1997-03-04· cited 80×
- United States v. William Richard MinorNinth Circuit· 1988-05-13· cited 74×
- United States v. LopezNinth Circuit· 1996-11-08· cited 46×
- United States v. RodriguezFirst Circuit· 1997-05-01· cited 45×
- United States v. Robert MorrisD.C. Circuit· 1997-06-13· cited 40×
- United States v. Gregory G. LewisNinth Circuit· 1988-12-01· cited 32×
- United States v. RodriguezFifth Circuit· 1997-05-20· cited 31×
- Boyless v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-06-27· cited 29×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.