United States v. Howard Eugene Liner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that in a criminal case, “the moving party must show the witness’s unavailability and the materiality of the witness’s testimony”
• explaining that in a criminal case, “the moving party must show the witness’s unavailability and the materiality of the witness’s testimony”
• affirming denial of letter rogatory to depose a witness where defendant offered no evidence that witness’s 63 No. 09-10560 testimony would be material
• affirming denial of letter rogatory to depose a witness where defendant offered no evidence that witness’s 63 No. 09-10560 testimony would be material
• affirming denial of letter rogatory to depose a witness where defendant offered no evidence that witness’s 63 No. 09-10560 testimony would be material
• affirming denial of letter rogatory to depose a witness where defendant offered no evidence that witness’s 63 No. 09-10560 testimony would be material

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).