Skip to main content
· 3/13/1970

United States v. Hout

Citations

  • 19 C.M.A. 299
  • 19 USCMA 299
  • 41 C.M.R. 299
  • 1970 CMA LEXIS 928
  • 1970 WL 7333

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that to interpret congressional reference to abrogate cause of action stated therein would render law “dead letter”
  • determining whether Naval officer should be compensated retroactively for lost retirement pay and active-duty pay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Darden, Ferguson, Quinn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.