United States v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that relator had only secondhand information of a fraud it did not directly observe
• finding that the relator was not the “original source” because he did not have “direct and independent knowledge” of the most critical element of his claims in the qui tam complaint
• “[A] FOIA request has been made public through the administrative process and cannot form the basis of a qui tam action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).